
Since aircraft consume such large amounts of fuel, achieving greater efficiency is a good way to decrease CO
2 emissions. For example, by reducing the angle of the wing flaps during landing, noise is reduced, and fuel can be saved. When the pilot of a 747-400 chooses this landing method after considering safety based on various conditions including air currents and the length of the runway, CO
2 emissions can be reduced by 300 kilograms each time. Moreover, employing idle reverse (similar to putting a car into neutral) to stop the aircraft after landing, instead of reversing the engines which results in a lot of fuel consumption and noise, can eliminate 300 kilograms of CO
2 emissions.
Captain Matsuda explained, “These ‘eco-flight’ techniques - as we call them - were originally carried out by pilots based on their experience. Team Minus 6% initiatives, organized by 30 flight-crew members, spread such techniques to the entire company through awareness-raising efforts. As a result of internal education such as publishing CO
2 reduction effects in an in-house newsletter, the rate of implementation for these techniques is now over 50%. Considering that eco-flight techniques are not always usable depending on the circumstances, this implementation rate is extremely high.”
It is also more efficient to use power from the airport, rather than the onboard auxiliary power unit, to supply the aircraft’s lighting and air-conditioning needs while it is still at the gate.
Captain Matsuda elaborated on this point, “Although it increases the burden on aircraft ground crews, we are promoting the use of airport power supply due to the substantial reduction of CO
2 emissions it allows. When I was at the Vancouver Airport recently, I noticed that JAL was the only airline using this technique.”