Top of page.
- Skip the menu to main contents.
Link for header starts here.
ここから本文です。
787 Modification Work and Flight Status
Outline of Troubles in the past
|
|
Date |
Flight number |
Impact on flight |
Outline of trouble |
|
106 |
December 27 2014 |
JAL65 San Diego |
Ground Turnback Departure Actual 12:55 Delay 1:10 |
- The airplane returned to the departure
spot because a message regarding a part of the GPWS failure appeared on the
screen in flight deck. |
|
105 |
December 21 2014 |
JAL741 Tokyo(Narita) |
None |
- Minor damage on the access panel located
at left wing pylon was found during ground stay. |
|
104 |
December 19 2014 |
JAL408 Frankfurt |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 15:39/20 Delay 20:29 |
- Failure of a part of the flaperon system on
left wing occurred during previous flight (The flight was operated normally). |
|
103 |
December 2 2014 |
JAL727 Kansai |
Ground Turnback Departure Actual 20:10 Delay 2:50 |
- The airplane returned to the departure
spot because a message regarding one of 14 Spoilers on wings failure appeared
on the screen in flight deck. |
|
102 |
December 1 2014 |
JAL813 Kansai |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 16:45 Delay 7:35 |
- Failure of a part of the brake control system
occurred during previous flight (Landing of the flight was normal). |
|
101 |
November 28 2014 |
JAL785 Honolulu |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 12:46/29 Delay 27:11 |
- Failure of the Air Traffic Controller
Transponder/Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System occurred during
pre-flight check. |
|
100 |
November 4 2014 |
JAL783 Honolulu |
Ground Turnback Departure Actual 09:37/5 Delay 21:12 |
- The airplane returned to the departure
spot because a message regarding one of 14 Spoilers failure appeared on the
screen in flight deck. The airplane re-departed after maintenance. However,
the airplane returned to the gate again due to the same message. |
|
99 |
November 1 2014 |
JAL21 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 11:22 Delay 2:12 |
- A possible failure regarding the main
battery charging system was found during pre-flight check. No smoke and no overheated
condition were observed on the battery. Removal and replacement of the
battery and the battery charger resolved anomaly. Investigation will be
performed together with makers. |
|
98 |
October 27 2014 |
JAL783 Honolulu |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 05:38/28 Delay 17:13 |
- The pressure indication on the flight crew oxygen system failed during pre-flight check. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL783 was operated by another Boeing 787 with delay. |
|
97 |
October 24 2014 |
JAL783 Honolulu |
Ground Turnback Departure Actual 14:37 Delay 1:52 |
- The airplane returned to the departure spot because a message regarding the cockpit door lock system failure appeared on the screen in flight deck after engines started. The airplane re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities on the cockpit door lock system. |
|
96 |
October 15 2014 |
JAL414 Helsinki |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 02:14/17 Delay 32:49 |
- Two air conditioning systems are installed on airplane. Messages regarding one of these two air conditioning systems failure appeared on the screen in flight deck during pre-flight preparation. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL414 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
95 |
October 6 2014 |
JAL3082 Nagoya |
Ground Turnback Departure Actual 09:46 Delay 1:26 |
- Two generator systems are installed on each engine. One of these two generator systems on left engine failed during engines start (the failure has no relation to the battery system). The airplane re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities on the generator system. |
|
94 |
September 28 2014 |
JAL415 Tokyo(Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure Actual 16:52 Delay 2:17 |
- The airplane returned to the departure spot because message regarding one pump failure out of two fuel pumps of right wing fuel tank appeared on the screen in flight deck. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL415 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
93 |
September 21 2014 |
JAL783 Honolulu |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 15:28 Delay 2:08 |
- Messages regarding flight computer system appeared on the screen in flight deck at departure. The airplane departed with delay after the required maintenance activities on the computer system. |
|
92 |
September 2 2014 |
JAL784 Tokyo(Narita) |
Air Turnback Departure Actual 09:38/3 Delay 12:33 |
- During climbing after take-off, one system out of two air conditioning systems failed. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL784 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
91 |
August 30 2014 |
JAL783 Honolulu |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 03:13/31 Delay 13:53 |
- During ground handling, minor damage occurred on the aircraft. Relative parts need to be removed and replaced. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL783 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
90 |
August 20 2014 |
During maintenance activities |
None |
- During the main battery check on the ground, the sign which indicates the trouble of the battery charger was displayed on the cockpit indicator. The inspection of the battery revealed that there were no abnormalities such as smoke or overheat. The sign of trouble went off after the replacement of the battery charger and the battery. No abnormalities are found in the removed battery. |
|
89 |
August 16 2014 |
JAL65 San Diego |
Air Turnback Departure |
- During flight, two systems out of three flight management systems failed. So it was decided to return to San Diego for the maintenance activities. The airplane landed safely approx. 5 hours later after takeoff. The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight re-departed with delay. |
|
88 |
August 16 2014 |
JAL4 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure Actual 20:04 |
- The airplane returned to the departure spot because the altimeter system failed. The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight re-departed with delay. |
|
87 |
August 15 2014 |
JAL8791 Honolulu |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 09:43/16 Delay 24:43 |
- Failure of a part of the landing gear control system occurred during previous flight(Landing of the flight was normal). The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
86 |
August 12 2014 |
JAL416 Paris |
Flight Cancel Departure |
- Failure of the Air Traffic Controller Transponder/Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System occurred during previous flight. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL416 was canceled. |
|
85 |
August 11 2014 |
JAL3 New York |
Flight Cancel Departure |
- The battery on the airplane was discharged due to the ground electrical power equipment failure when parking (the failure has no relation to the battery system). As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities such as retrieving electrical power of the battery, JAL3 was canceled. |
|
84 |
July 19 2014 |
JAL3087 Tokyo (Narita) |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 21:20 |
- The airplane was hit by lightning strike during the previous flight. (There was no effect on flight.) As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL3087 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
83 |
July 18 2014 |
JAL3 New York |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 20:37 |
- A computer which controls some airplane systems failed on the airplane to be used. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL3 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
82 |
July 18 2014 |
JAL8829 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Ground Turnback Departure Actual 17:04 |
- The airplane has returned to the departure spot because one brake out of 8 brakes on the main landing gear wheels became inoperative after push back. The airplane re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities on the brake system. |
|
81 |
July 10 2014 |
JAL2 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure Actual 01:06 |
- The airplane has returned to the departure spot because one brake out of 8 brakes on the main landing gear wheels became inoperative after push back. The airplane re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities on the brake system. |
|
80 |
July 9 2014 |
JAL783 Honolulu |
Ground Turnback Departure Actual 14:56 |
- The airplane has returned to the departure spot after engine start due to failure of one of the two fuel pumps in the center tank. The airplane re-departed with delay after maintenance activities required. |
|
79 |
July 3 2014 |
JAL3 New York |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 11:53 |
- A computer which controls some airplane systems failed during pre-flight preparation. The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
78 |
June 22 2014 |
JAL416 Paris |
Flight Cancel Departure |
- The emergency lighting system in the cabin failed during previous flight. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL416 was canceled. |
|
77 |
June 14 2014 |
JAL3 New York |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 12:02 |
- Two generator systems are installed on each engine. One of these two generator systems on left engine failed during engines start (the failure has no relation to the battery system). The airplane re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities on the generator system. |
|
76 |
June 12 2014 |
JAL8 Tokyo (Narita) |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 14:12 |
- The airplane has returned to the departure spot because the electrical power unit for some brakes failed during taxiing (the failure has no relation to the battery system). As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL8 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
75 |
June 8 2014 |
JAL3082 Nagoya |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 12:18 |
- One of the lower leading edge panels on left wing was found to be damaged slightly during pre-flight inspection. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL3082 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
74 |
June 3 2014 |
JAL7 Boston |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 17:07 |
- The electrical power unit for some brakes failed during previous flight (the failure has no relation to the battery system). The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
73 |
May 22 2014 |
JAL1 San Francisco |
Ground Turnback Departure Actual 20:11 |
- The airplane has returned to the departure spot during taxiing because one brake out of 8 brakes on the main landing gear wheels became inoperative. The airplane re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities on the brake. |
|
72 |
May 22 2014 |
JAL7 |
Departure Delay Departure Actual 14:20/23 |
- The altitude selector on the autopilot mode control panel became inoperative during previous flight. The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
71 |
May 21 2014 |
JAL3087 |
Ground Turnback Departure Actual 20:09 |
- The airplane has returned to the departure spot during taxiing because one brake out of 8 brakes on the main landing gear wheels became inoperative. The airplane re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities on the brake. |
|
70 |
May 17 2014 |
JAL65 |
Departure Delay Departure Actual May 18 15:24 |
- The condition of the main gear was confirmed. As it will take time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL65 departed on the next day. |
|
69 |
May 13 2014 |
JAL1 San Francisco |
Departure Delay Departure |
- Two generator systems are installed on each engine. One of these two generator systems on left engine failed during pre-flight inspection (the failure has no relation to the battery system). As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL1 was canceled. |
|
68 |
May 11 2014 |
JAL414 Helsinki |
Departure Delay Departure |
- After landing on the previous flight, the ram air turbine deployed. The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
67 |
May 10 2014 |
JAL66 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- At the departure, the failure of the Air Traffic Controller Transponder/Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System has occurred. The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
66 |
April 29 2014 |
JAL17 Vancouver |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- At the departure, the airplane returned to the departure spot due to weather radar failure. The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
65 |
April 24 2014 |
JAL1 San Francisco |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane returned to the departure spot just before taxiing due to left engine failure during engines start. The airplane re-departed after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
64 |
April 14 2014 |
JAL17 Vancouver |
Flight Cancel Departure |
- At the pre-flight inspection, the sign which indicates the possibility of the failure of the nose gear was displayed. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL17 was canceled. |
|
63 |
April 13 2014 |
JAL442 Moscow |
Departure Delay Departure |
- At the pre-flight inspection, one of two air conditioning system cooling fan which is used on the ground failed. The airplane has departed with delay after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
62 |
April 6 2014 |
JAL785 Honolulu |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane returned to the departure spot just before taxiing due to the failure of one of the four brake actuators on one wheel. The airplane re-departed after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
61 |
April 4 2014 |
JAL1 San Francisco |
Flight Cancel Departure |
- At the departure, the right engine could not be started. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL1 was canceled. |
|
60 |
March 19 2014 |
JAL869 Tokyo (Narita) |
Departure Delay Departure |
- At the pre-flight inspection, one of two radio beacon receivers failed. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL869 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
59 |
March 17 2014 |
JAL21 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Departure Delay Departure |
- Two generators are installed on each engine. One of these two generators on right engine failed during engine start (the failure has no relation to the battery system). The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
58 |
March 16 2014 |
JAL860 Beijing |
Flight Cancel Departure |
- At the pre-flight inspection, a computer which controls some airplane systems failed. As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL860 was canceled. |
|
57 |
March 14 2014 |
JAL8 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane returned to the departure spot during taxiing (running on the taxiway) due to the failure of one of the four brake actuators on one wheel. The airplane re-departed after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
56 |
March 14 2014 |
JAL97 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Departure Delay Departure |
- Two generators are installed on each engine. One of these two generators on right engine failed during engine start, so the airplane returned to the departure gate (the failure has no relation to the battery system). As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL97 from Tokyo (Haneda) to Taipei/Songshan and its return flight JAL98 from Songshan to Tokyo (Haneda) have been operated by Boeing 767 instead of Boeing 787. |
|
55 |
March 12 2014 |
JAL408 Frankfurt |
Departure Delay Departure |
- In the pre-flight inspection, the sign which indicates the possibility of the failure of the tilt function for the left main gear was displayed. As it will take time to conduct the required maintenance activities, it will pass the airport operating hour. Therefore, JAL408 will depart on the next day. |
|
54 |
March 9 2014 |
JAL2 Tokyo (Haneda) San Francisco
|
Diversion Departure |
- During flight, the right engine oil pressure and quantity showed decreasing tendency, so the diversion to the nearest airport, Honolulu was decided. The airplane landed safely at Honolulu approx. 8 hours after takeoff. At the approach to the Honolulu, the oil pressure was getting low, so the right engine was shutdown. According to the company regulations, the pilot declared an "emergency" which gives the priority for the air traffic control. JAL2 was terminated at Honolulu. |
|
53 |
March 1 2014 |
JAL22 Beijing |
Departure Delay Departure |
- In the pre-flight inspection, the cargo room fire extinguishing system failed. The airplane has departed with delay after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
52 |
February 21 2014 |
JAL21 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane has been returned to the departure spot after engine start due to the failure of the Auxiliary Power Unit. The airplane has re-departed after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
51 |
February 15 2014 |
JAL97 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Departure Delay Departure *Including a delay of 8:24 caused by the snow condition of Tokyo area. |
- During the passenger boarding, the left side passenger entry door emergency light failed, so the passengers were asked to disembark once for the maintenance activities. The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
50 |
February 6 2014 |
JAL33 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- Two generators are installed on each engine. A part of the control circuit for one of these two generators on left engine failed during engine start, so the airplane returned to the departure gate (the failure has no relation to the battery system). The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
49 |
February 6 2014 |
JAL97 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Departure Delay Departure |
- At the pre-flight inspection, a computer which controls some airplane systems failed. The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
48 |
February 3 2014 |
JAL1 San Francisco |
Flight Cancel Departure |
- In the pre-flight inspection, air cooling system for the electrical equipment bay didn’t operate (It has no relation to the battery system). As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL1 was canceled. |
|
47 |
February 3 2014 |
JAL97 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane has been returned to the departure spot during taxiing because the brake system of one of total 8 wheels of the main landing gears became inoperative. The airplane re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities including inoperative brake and tire replacement were conducted.
|
|
46 |
January 27 2014 |
JAL22 Beijing |
Flight Cancel Departure |
- In the pre-flight inspection, it was found that a part of the fuselage aerodynamic cover remained in open position. (When the flaps extend, the cover opens to avoid the interference with the flaps. When the flaps retract, the cover closes to reduce the air drag. The flap is the system which is installed on the trailing edge of the main wing and increases the lift at takeoff or landing by extending) - As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL22 was canceled. |
|
45 |
January 27 2014 |
JAL8 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- After engine start, the failure of a part of electrical system occurred, so the airplane returned to the departure gate (the failure has no relation to the battery system). As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL8 was operated by another Boeing 787 with delay. |
|
44 |
January 24 2014 |
JAL718 Bangkok |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- Two generators are installed on each engine. One of these two generators on right engine failed during engine start, so the airplane returned to the departure gate (the failure has no relation to the battery system). The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
43 |
January 23 2014 |
JAL65 San Diego |
Flight Cancel Departure |
- In the pre-flight inspection, the sign which indicates the possibility of the failure of a part of flight control system was displayed (the failure has no relation to the battery system). As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL65 was canceled. |
|
42 |
January 17 2014 |
JAL33 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Departure Delay Departure |
- During previous flight, one of the three backup hydraulic pumps installed on the airplane failed (There was no effect on flight.). The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities including the pump replacement. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
41 |
January 14 2014 |
JAL707 Tokyo (Narita) |
None |
- A maintenance personnel in the cockpit found that the white smoke was wafting outside of the window and that the message which indicated the possibility of main battery system failure was displayed on the cockpit display during departure preparation. - The inspection of the battery case inside the battery enclosure revealed that the safety pressure relief valve (which opens in case that the cell inside pressure rises) of one cell of the eight cells opened. - JAL707 departed by another Boeing 787 almost on time. |
|
40 |
January 5 2014 |
JAL8 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- After engine start, the failure of a part of electrical system occurred, so the airplane returned to the departure gate (the failure has no relation to the battery system). As it took time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL8 was operated by another Boeing 787 with delay. |
|
39 |
December 30 2013 |
JAL7 Boston |
Departure Delay Departure |
- During previous flight, the auto-throttle system temporarily failed. After the arrival at Boston, the failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities including electronic engine control system functional test. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
38 |
November 21 2013 |
JAL740 Delhi |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane has been returned to the departure spot (running on the taxiway) during takeoff due to the failure of the brake system. The inspection revealed that one of the four brake actuators on one wheel failed. The airplane has re-departed after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
37 |
November 16 2013 |
JAL712 Singapore |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane returned to the departure spot as the left engine didn’t start. The airplane re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities including engine control computer reset and the engine test run were conducted. |
|
36 |
November 15 2013 |
JAL65 San Diego |
Emergency Landing Arrival |
- During flight, the navigation computer failed. The airplane landed safely at Tokyo (Narita). But the visibility worsened at landing, so the pilot, according to the regulations, declared an "emergency" which gives the priority for the air traffic control. |
|
35 |
November 15 2013 |
JAL749 Tokyo (Narita) |
Air Turnback Departure |
- During flight, the sign which indicates the failure of the fuel filter for the left engine was displayed, so it was decided to return to Tokyo (Narita) for the maintenance activities. The airplane landed safely approx. 4 hour later after takeoff. JAL749 re-departed on the next day by another Boeing 787 as it took time to trouble shoot and conduct the required maintenance activities. |
|
34 |
November 11 2013 |
JAL749 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- At the departure push-back, the sign which indicates the failure of the computer which controls the brake system was displayed. The airplane returned to the departure spot. The flight re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities were conducted including the failed computer replacement. |
|
33 |
November 10 2013 |
JAL441 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane has been returned to the departure spot during taxiing for the inspection because the air temperature indications on the cockpit indicators temporarily went blank though the indications restored after a while. The airplane re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
32 |
November 8 2013 |
JAL414 Helsinki |
None |
- During flight, the sign which indicates the trouble of the APU (Auxiliary Power Unit) battery was displayed on the cockpit indicator. However, the voltage and electrical current were within normal range and there was no effect on remainder of the flight. - After the arrival at Tokyo (Narita), the inspection of the APU battery revealed that there were no abnormalities such as smoke or overheat. - The sign of trouble went off after the replacement of the APU battery and the battery charger. Then the functional test for the airplane battery system conducted and it was confirmed that the system functioned normal. - The inspection for the removed APU battery is in progress. No abnormalities are found so far. The inspection is continued. |
|
31 |
November 4 2013 |
JAL66 Tokyo (Narita) |
Diversion Departure |
- During flight, a part of the data converter repeater was failed. As the result, the cockpit indication of the brake temperature for the 2 tires out of total 8 main tires disappeared, so the return was decided. But the arrival time was beyond the operating hour (until 23:00) of Tokyo (Narita), the airplane landed safely at Tokyo (Haneda) approx. 7 hour after takeoff. JAL66 re-departed on the next day by another Boeing 787. |
|
30 |
November 4 2013 |
JAL413 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane returned to the departure spot during taxiing (running on the taxiway) due to the failure of one of the four brake actuators on one wheel. The airplane re-departed after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
29 |
October 25 2013 |
JAL2 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Departure Delay Departure |
- At the pre-flight inspection, a failure of a computer which controls the brake system was found. The failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities including the failed computer replacement. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
28 |
October 19 2013 |
JAL35 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Departure Delay Departure |
- During previous flight, slat system which is installed on the leading edge of the main wing and increases the lift at takeoff or landing by extending failed. As it took time to conduct required maintenance activities including related parts replacement, JAL35 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
27 |
October 13 2013 |
JAL1 San Francisco |
Departure Delay Departure |
- During previous flight, a computer which controls some airplane systems failed. (There was no effect on flight.) After arrival to San Francisco, the failure was resolved with the required maintenance activities. Therefore, the subject flight departed with delay. |
|
26 |
October 13 2013 |
JAL442 Moscow |
Departure Delay Departure |
- After landing of previous flight, the failure of one of four elevators which are installed on the trailing edge of the horizontal stabilizer and control the airplane’s vertical situation failed. (There was no effect on landing.) As it took time to conduct required maintenance activities including related parts replacement, JAL442 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
25 |
October 9 2013 |
JAL65 San Diego |
Air Turnback Departure |
- The failure on the anti-ice system which prevented the ice buildup on the air intake of the right engine has occurred during climb after takeoff. The flight crew decided to return to San Diego considering the weather condition to Tokyo. The airplane landed safely approx. 1 hour and a half later after takeoff. The airplane has re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
24 |
October 9 2013 |
JAL442 Moscow |
Air Turnback Departure |
- During flight, an electrical current control system (transformer rectifier system) failed. Consequently, the flushing function became inoperative in 6 of all 7 lavatories, so it was decided to return to Moscow for the maintenance activities. The airplane landed safely approx. 4 hour and a half later after takeoff. The airplane has re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
23 |
September 28 2013 |
JAL740 Delhi |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane has been returned to the departure spot after engine start due to a failure of one of the two pumps in the center tank. The airplane has re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
22 |
September 9 2013 |
JAL710 Singapore |
Flight Cancel Departure |
- In the previous flight, lightning hit was experienced. There was no airplane system anomaly and no interference to the safe operation. The airplane continued flight and landed at Singapore safely. After the arrival, the inspection revealed such minor damage as the surface material peeling on the right engine cover trailing edge and right main wing tip. As it takes time to conduct the required maintenance activities, JAL710 was canceled. |
|
21 |
August 27 2013 |
JAL66 Tokyo (Narita) |
Air Turnback Departure |
- During flight, slat system which is installed on the leading edge of the main wing and increases the lift at takeoff or landing by extending failed, so it was decided to return to Tokyo (Narita) for the maintenance activities. JAL66 re-departed on the next day by another Boeing 787. |
|
20 |
August 22 2013 |
JAL8 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- Two generators and two generator controllers are installed on each engine and one of these two generator controllers on right engine failed after engine start. As it took time to trouble shoot and repair, JAL8 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay.
|
|
19 |
August 17 2013 |
JAL711 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane has been returned to the departure spot during taxiing due to a mechanical failure of one of the two pumps in the right tank. As it took time to trouble shoot and repair, JAL711 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
18 |
August 14 2013 |
JAL7 Boston |
Departure Delay Departure |
- An interphone system between pilots and cabin attendants failed. The airplane substantially delayed due to the replacement parts preparation. |
|
17 |
August 14 2013 |
JAL413 Tokyo (Narita) |
Air Turnback Departure |
- JAL received the information today (August 14) that the defect was found in the engine fire extinguishing system wiring on another operator’s 787. JAL started the one-time inspection (all airplanes inspection) of the system. Though JAL413 was cruising at that time, it was decided to return to Tokyo (Narita) for the inspection in consideration of the remaining flight time. The airplane landed at Tokyo (Narita) approx. four hours after takeoff. No defect was found as the result of the inspection. JAL413 re-departed with approx. seven hours delay by another airplane inspected. - For all ten 787s that JAL operates, the inspection was made before the flight and confirmed that there was no defect. |
|
16 |
August 7 2013 |
JAL36 Singapore |
Air Turnback Departure |
- During flight, the airborne weather radar system failed, so
it was decided to return to Singapore for the maintenance activities. Approx.
two hours later from takeoff, the airplane landed safely. |
|
15 |
August 5 2013 |
JAL719 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane returned to the departure spot because the route was not displayed properly on the first officer's navigation display during taxiing (running on the taxiway). The failure was resolved by resetting the route calculating and displaying equipment, and then the airplane re-departed. With these maintenance activities and waiting for the thunder cloud to pass, the departure delayed. |
|
14 |
July 28 2013 |
JAL719 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane has been returned to the departure spot after engine start due to a mechanical failure of one of the two pumps in the center tank. The airplane has re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
13 |
July 18 2013 |
JAL7 Boston |
Air Turnback Departure |
- During flight, a fuel pump which supplied the fuel to the right engine failed. Though the fuel was being supplied normally, the airplane decided to return to Boston for the maintenance activities. Approx. five hours later from takeoff, the airplane landed safely. At Boston, the maintenance activities including fuel pump replacement was conducted and these activities took time, so JAL7 was canceled. |
|
12 |
July 16 2013 |
JAL21 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Airplane type change Departure |
- In the inspection for the Boeing 787 which was planned to operate JAL21, a failure was revealed in one electrical generating system out of four systems. As it took time to replace the related parts, JAL21 from Tokyo (Haneda) to Beijing and its return flight JAL22 from Beijing to Tokyo (Haneda) have been operated by Boeing 767 instead of Boeing 787. |
|
11 |
July 15 2013 |
JAL414 Helsinki |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- After engine start, the failure of one of fourteen spoilers which are installed on the main wing and control the lift occurred, so the airplane returned to the departure gate. The failure was resolved but the airplane departed with delay due to the required maintenance activities.
|
|
10 |
July 11 2013 |
JAL65 San Diego |
Departure Delay Departure |
- The failure of the Air Traffic Controller Transponder/Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System at the pre-flight inspection has occurred. The antenna installed on the top of the fuselage was inspected and replaced, then the failure restored. As it took time, the airplane departed with delay. |
|
9 |
July 1 2013 |
JAL712 Singapore |
Departure Delay Departure |
- In the pre-flight inspection, the airborne weather radar system failed. The system restored with the system reset, but it took time. Therefore, the airplane departed with delay. |
|
8 |
June 29 2013 |
JAL65 San Diego |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- After engine start, the failure of one of fourteen spoilers which are installed on the main wing and controll the lift occurred. The airplane departed with delay due to the inspections and the required maintenance activities for the safe flight. |
|
7
|
June 20 2013 |
JAL36 Singapore |
Departure Delay Departure |
- In the pre-flight inspection, it was found that the pressure sensor for the compressed air reservoir for right hand 3rd door which is to open the door automatically in case of trouble failed. The airplane departed with delay due to the inspections and the required maintenance activities for the safe flight. |
|
6 |
June 16 2013 |
JAL21 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane has been returned to the departure spot during taxiing (running on the taxiway) due to the failure of the brake system. The inspection revealed that one of the four brake actuators on one wheel was inoperative. The airplane has re-departed after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
5 |
June 14 2013 |
JAL8 Tokyo (Narita) |
Departure Delay Departure |
- The failure of the Air Traffic Controller Transponder/Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System at the pre-flight inspection has occurred. The antenna installed on the forward fuselage was replaced and the related wirings were checked. As it took time, JAL8 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
4 |
June 14 2013 |
JAL749 Tokyo (Narita) |
Departure Delay Departure |
- Two starter motors are installed on each engine and one of these two motors on left engine failed at departure. As it took time to trouble shoot and repair, JAL749 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. |
|
3 |
June 11 2013 |
JAL35 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Air Turnback Departure Delay Departure |
- The failure on the anti-ice system which prevented the ice buildup on the air intake of the left engine has occurred during climb after takeoff. The flight crew decided to return to Tokyo (Haneda) considering the weather condition to Singapore. The airplane landed safely approx. 1 hour later after takeoff. JAL35 was operated by another Boeing 787 and departed with delay. - Due to this schedule interruption, JAL21 from Tokyo (Haneda) to Beijing and its return flight JAL22 from Beijing to Tokyo (Haneda) have been operated by Boeing 767 instead of Boeing 787. |
|
2 |
June 4 2013 |
JAL711 Tokyo (Narita) |
Ground Turnback Departure |
- The airplane has been returned to the departure spot after engine start due to a mechanical failure of one of the two pumps in the center tank. The airplane has re-departed with delay after the required maintenance activities were conducted. |
|
1 |
June 2 2013 |
JAL21 Tokyo (Haneda) |
Airplane type change Departure |
- The flight has been operated by Boeing 767 instead of Boeing 787 due to airplane inspection (see below). Return flight JAL22 from Beijing to Tokyo (Haneda) departing at 16:40 has also been operated by Boeing 767. - During
turn-round inspection between previous arrival and next departure, it was
found that the indicator which showed the difference in pressure between
inside and outside of the APU (Auxiliary
Power Unit) battery enclosure box has activated, therefore the inspection was
conducted. |
